Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Trump’s Big, Beautiful Bill Accelerates Hydrogen Economy’s Inevitable Fall

    Don’t mess with Texas: bill begins to tackle the clean up challenge of inactive oil and gas wells

    Microsoft is not backing off its 2030 carbon negative climate goal

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Solaris Alternative EnergySolaris Alternative Energy
    • Alternative Energy
    • Energy Hub
    • Environment Issues
    • GreenBiz
    • Renewable News
    • Wind Energy
    Solaris Alternative EnergySolaris Alternative Energy
    You are at:Home»Energy Hub»Carbon Neutrality Suit Against Delta Airlines Signals the Arrival Time of “Greenwashing” Litigation
    Energy Hub

    Carbon Neutrality Suit Against Delta Airlines Signals the Arrival Time of “Greenwashing” Litigation

    adminBy adminJune 15, 2023013 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



    A recent class action filed against Delta Airlines is among the first major consumer cases targeting claims of carbon neutrality. The complaint, filed in Mayanna Berrin v. Delta Airlines Inc., No. 2:23-cv-04150 (C.D. Cal.) on May 30, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, takes aim at Delta Airlines’ “carbon neutral” representations, alleging an unreliable carbon offset market renders Delta Airlines’ environmentally friendly representations false and misleading. When marketing carbon reduction achievements, companies should be aware of potential overstatements that may lead to litigation claims and should hire ESG counsel to efficiently and effectively advise on these matters.

    The Lawsuit

    Plaintiffs’ representative Mayanna Berrin filed the class action lawsuit on behalf of a putative class of consumers, alleging Delta Airlines is “grossly misrepresenting the total environmental impact of its business operation in its advertisements, corporate announcements, and promotional materials, thereby attaining undeserved market share and extracting higher prices from consumers.” The complaint brings three causes of action under California consumer protection statutes: (1) the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code § 1750, et seq.; (2) the False Advertising Law, Business and Professions Code § 17500, et seq.; and (3) the Unfair Competition Law, Business and Professions Code §17200, et seq.

    At the center of the plaintiffs’ substantive allegations is Delta Airlines’ reliance on its participation in the carbon offset market and representing itself as “the world’s first carbon-neutral airline.” Plaintiffs allege these carbon offset markets are unreliable due to inaccurate accounting, dubious crediting practices, delayed and speculative emissions reductions, and impermanent projects subject to disease, natural disasters, and human intervention. In other words, the plaintiffs deem the carbon offset markets unreliable as self-regulated and devoid of standardization. The plaintiffs further claim these alleged misrepresentations caused them to purchase and overpay for Delta Airlines’ flight tickets when some of them otherwise would not have, but for Delta Airlines’ “carbon neutral” representations.

    Broader Trends and Implications

    More companies and organizations are creating ESG reports with a fulsome evaluation of their environmental, social, and governance metrics and accomplishments. (For example, see Foley & Lardner’s 2023 ESG report here). As consumers have begun basing their purchasing decisions on ESG factors and initiatives, companies have begun highlighting their commitments to ESG efforts in marketing their products and services. These campaigns have brought a rise in class action lawsuits involving “allegations of false or deceptive advertising related to consumer products,” known in the environmental context as greenwashing. These class actions have started to shift from challenging the performance or features of products to challenging alleged falsities surrounding advertisements describing a company’s environmental, sustainability, and ethics practices.

    The rapid growth of the carbon commodities market holds significant promise for companies seeking to offset carbon emissions. However, in broadcasting these efforts to consumers, companies should ensure their environmental claims are substantiated and built to withstand any alleged false advertising and greenwashing claims. In particular, companies should (i) independently verify the accounting of purchased carbon offsets; (ii) provide limiting liability language via a website link on any advertisements promoting their carbon reduction efforts, which fulsomely describes the limitations of any such carbon reduction efforts; and (iii) engage ESG counsel to evaluate fully the advantages and risks of making carbon reduction claims in public statements, to avoid civil and SEC liability.

    Foley & Lardner LLP has an ESG team with extensive experience in counseling clients on green claims. For questions or concerns about greenwashing and other ESG issues, contact the authors of this article or your Foley attorney.

    This article was written with the assistance of summer associate Kelsey Kreindler.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleCorio CEO Jonathan Cole appointed new GWEC Chairman
    Next Article Episode 368: Mining, child labor and Indigenous wisdom
    admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Live from Dallas: The Peaks and Valleys of Investing in the Energy Transition

    November 6, 2023

    Have You Checked Your Purchase Order? Do You Know Who Your Counterparty Is?

    October 30, 2023

    Texas Supreme Court Decides What “One-Half of One-Eighth” Means in 1924 Oil and Gas Deed

    September 6, 2023
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Renewable Energy Market and Growth Update 2023

    September 15, 202312 Views

    what’s next for DOE’s hydrogen and direct air capture hubs, and how to engage in the process

    April 26, 202311 Views

    Meta will pay $1.4 billion to Texas, settling biometric data collection suit

    July 30, 20245 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    Comparison: The Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of COVID-19

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021

    Florida Surgeon General’s Covid Vaccine Claims Harm Public

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021

    Signs of Endometriosis: What are Common and Surprising Symptoms?

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021
    Most Popular

    Renewable Energy Market and Growth Update 2023

    September 15, 202312 Views

    what’s next for DOE’s hydrogen and direct air capture hubs, and how to engage in the process

    April 26, 202311 Views
    Categories
    • Alternative Energy
    • Energy Hub
    • Environment Issues
    • GreenBiz
    • Renewable News
    • Uncategorized
    • Wind Energy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.